한국조세재정연구원 - OAK리포지터리

Korea Institute of Public Finance
Open Access Repository

BROWSE BY

상세정보

An Analysis of Government Program's Performance and Its Policy Implications cover image

An Analysis of Government Program's Performance and Its Policy Implications

Keyword
성과관리, 성과관리
Title
An Analysis of Government Program's Performance and Its Policy Implications
An Analysis of Government Program's Performance and Its Policy Implications
Authors
박노욱; Nowook Park; Jonghak Weon; 원종학; Nowook Park; Jonghak Weon
Issue Date
2012-12-01
2012-12-01
Publisher
KIPF
KIPF
Abstract
This study is carried out to identify policy issues of spending programs in the Korean government, in an effort to improve their effieiency and effectiveness. This study analyzes the assessment results from spending review process in the Korean government. The statistical analysis is conducted to examine whether the characteristics of spending programs affects the assessment results. The characteristics of programs are classified based on the funding method, policy areas, budget size, program history and implementing organizations. This study finds the following. (1)Programs implemented by the central government perform better than those by local governments or private organizations. (2)Social welfare programs perform worse than other programs. (3)Programs with big budget perform better than those with small budget. (4)Programs implemented by agencies perform better than those by ministries. (5)Mandatory spending programs perform worse than discretionary programs.
This study is carried out to identify policy issues of spending programs in the Korean government, in an effort to improve their effieiency and effectiveness. This study analyzes the assessment results from spending review process in the Korean government. The statistical analysis is conducted to examine whether the characteristics of spending programs affects the assessment results. The characteristics of programs are classified based on the funding method, policy areas, budget size, program history and implementing organizations. This study finds the following. (1)Programs implemented by the central government perform better than those by local governments or private organizations. (2)Social welfare programs perform worse than other programs. (3)Programs with big budget perform better than those with small budget. (4)Programs implemented by agencies perform better than those by ministries. (5)Mandatory spending programs perform worse than discretionary programs. Policy implications from these findings are the following. (1)Service delivery process should be improved. (2)More efforts should be given to the management improvement of rapidly expanding social welfare programs. (3)Proper investment to performance management tends to improve programs' performance. (4)Organizational culture affects programs' performance. (5)More scrutiny should be given to the management of mandatory programs, since its demand projections are often overestimated and service delivery processes are not well-designed.
Keywords
성과관리, 성과관리
다운로드
qrcode

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

메뉴닫기